What the scene asks for

A living room, two friends on a couch, already engaged with each other; one continuous medium-wide shot.

  • At about three seconds, one of them produces exactly one brief fart.
  • Both react briefly and naturally.
  • They return to what they were doing before the clip ends.
  • No second emission, no intelligible speech, no music.

A summary of the scene definition every configuration was given. The exact prompt each model family received is published with the results; the human reviewers do not see it either.

The three factual questions

Every reviewer answers these in this order, yes, no or unclear, before rating anything. Unclear is a real answer and is never counted as a no.

  1. Was exactly one fart-like event clearly present? event question

    Primary — asks whether the event happened; never N/A

  2. Did the two people briefly react to it?

    Dependent — may become N/A when its prerequisite is absent

    • N/A — no event to react to — when question 1 is “no” (the scene’s event is absent)
    • N/A — no event/reaction relationship can be judged — at any time (the relevant behaviour cannot be seen or heard)
  3. Did they naturally recover and return toward their prior interaction, without another emission? primary causal question

    Dependent — may become N/A when its prerequisite is absent

    • N/A — no event to recover from — when question 1 is “no” (the scene’s event is absent)

Then three ratings, the same in every scene

  1. How real did the fart sound?
    1 Obviously fake · 2 Pretty fake · 3 Believable but imperfect · 4 Very believable · 5 Completely real
  2. Did the timing make sense? — This means whether the sound/action/reaction happened in a believable order at the right moment.
    1 Way off · 2 Mostly off · 3 Mostly right · 4 Very good · 5 Exactly right
  3. Did the people and movement feel natural?
    1 Very unnatural · 2 Mostly unnatural · 3 Mostly natural · 4 Very natural · 5 Completely natural

← All four scenes